USPTO serial 75709478
ARON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD
Tu-Cheng City, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan, CN
Other trademarks owned by HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chi-Ping Chang
CHI-PING CHANG PACIFIC LAW GROUP LLPTWO N SECOND STSTE 290SAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER NETWORK COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SWITCHES, ROUTERS, FIRE WALLS, SERVERS, WORK STATIONS, CONCENTRATORS, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK DEVICES, AND ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS FOR USE IN COMPUTERS, SERVERS AND PORTABLE PERSONAL TELEPHONES, NAMELY NOTE BOOK PCs, MOBILE PHONES, WIRELESS PHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS AND SET-TOP BOXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |