USPTO serial 75709532
SMARTTOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTTOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott R. Zingerman
SCOTT R ZINGERMAN FELLERS, SNIDER, BLANKENSHIP, BAILEYTHE KENNEDY BLDG321 S BOSTON, STE 800TULSA, OK 74103-3318Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COOLING TOWERS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |