Drawing for ELI'S CHEESECAKE CUTIES

USPTO serial 75709730

ELI'S CHEESECAKE CUTIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELI'S CHEESECAKE CUTIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irwin C. Alter

IRWIN C ALTER ALTER AND WEISS105 W ADAMS STSTE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP FEATURING CHEESECAKEACTIVEJun 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 19, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance