USPTO serial 75709870
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WILMINGTON, DE
BINGHAM FARMS, MI
BINGHAM FARMS, MI
BINGHAM FARMS, MI
BINGHAM FARMS, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R Scott Keller
R SCOTT KELLER WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP900 OLD KENT BLDG111 LYON ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL MANUALS, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF COSMETICS AND TOILETRIES, CLOTHING, CLEANERS, WAXES, POLISHES, SOAPS, LAUNDRY PRODUCTS, DIETARY AND/OR FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, FOODS, HOUSEWARES, COOKWARE, CUTLERY, VACUUM CLEANERS, DOMESTIC WATER AND AIR TREATMENT SYSTEMS, FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES, VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES, AND AUTOMOTIVE CLUB SERVICES AND THE SALES AND MARKETING OF SUCH GOODS AND SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |