USPTO serial 75710825
ANCHORDESK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANCHORDESK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Van Kampen
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZD INC28 E 28TH STNEW YORK, NY 10016-7930UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Television programming which provides news, opinion, commentary and analysis on the subjects of computer technology, information technology, communications technology, high technology, product reviews and computer hardware and software; production of television programs; education and entertainment services, namely, ongoing television series and programs which provide news, opinion, commentary and analysis on the subjects of computer technology, information technology, communications technology, high technology, product reviews and computer hardware and software; production of pre-recorded video tapes, pre-recorded video cassettes and pre-recorded video discs featuring news, opinion, commentary and analysis on the subjects of computer technology, information technology, communications technology, high technology, product reviews and computer hardware and software; production or pre-recorded audio tapes, pre-recorded audio cassettes and pre-recorded audio discs featuring news, opinion, commentary and analysis on the subjects of computer technology, information technology, communications technology, high technology, product reviews and computer hardware and software; providing information about a television program series via a website on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |