Drawing for SMART CANDY

USPTO serial 75710946

SMART CANDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART CANDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle C. Burke

MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STSTE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless telecommunications equipment, namely voice and data transmitters and receivers, digital and cellular telephones, radio transmitters and receiversACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a database featuring information on a variety of topics of interest to the general public, such as news, sports and music, via telecommunications equipment, namely voice and data transmitters and receivers, cellular telephones, radio transmitters and receiversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 22, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance