USPTO serial 75711179
DCS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DCS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM E. O'BRIEN
WILLIAM E O'BRIEN333 S STSHREWSBURY, MA 01545UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer security systems for building access control, identification of living creatures, and securing computer networks comprised of LANS, personal computers, nad workstations against unauthorized access or data corruption, comprising computer hardware and parts therefor, computer operating system software and software to monitor and control computer security systems for building access control, identification of living creatures, and securing computer networks against unauthorized access or data corruption; computer security system access stories, namely, sensors, alarms, monitors, video displays, electronic locks, microphones, transmitters, cameras, and retinal scanners | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Computer security telecommunication services, namely, providing secured telecommunication connections for access to data banks, electronic payment systems and for accessing the identification or verification of living creatures on the world wide web | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in connection with control of access authorizations, for the communication of computers with each other and for computer-based identification and verification of living beings based on one or more specific biometric features; technical development of systems for monitoring access authorizations, for the communication of computers with each other and of systems for the computer-based identification and verification of living beings based on one or more specific biometric features; computer software design for others of programs for data management services in connection with access to data banks, electronic payment systems and the identification or verification of living creatures on the world wide web; computer services, namely, the networking of LANS, personal computers and work stations for the realization of intranets and their integration with the world wide and featuring the creation of "firewalls," technical design of computer systems for others to control access to databases, for the communication of computers with each other, for the computer assisted identification and verification of living beings, for solutions for the networking of LANS, personal computers and work stations and for the creation of intranets and their integration with the world wide web and their attachment to the world wide web with "firewalls" and real audio and video systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |