USPTO serial 75711369
COMEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2005
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
11000, Mexico, D.F., MX
Other trademarks owned by Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
11000, Mexico, D.F., MX
Other trademarks owned by Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
MEXICO, D.F., MX
Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
11000, Mexico, D.F., MX
Other trademarks owned by Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely asphalt roof coatings, bituminous roof coatings, tar based asphalt sealants, bitumen based asphalt sealants, tar based roofing sealants and bitumen based roofing sealants, texturized and coating materials in the nature of acrylic texture finished pastes, clay, fillers and plasters for use in repairing, decorating and protecting surfaces made of concrete dry wall, fiber-cement panels, brick, cement brick and plastered walls, wall and ceiling mortar-based, plaster-based and concrete-based water texture material for interior use formulated with excellent adhesion properties, hardness and for easy application with non flammable and non-toxic properties to be used over drywall, fiber-cement panels, brick, cement brick, and plastered walls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CONSORCIO COMEX, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Comercial Mexicana de Pinturas, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named COMEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 20, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 20, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |