Drawing for PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 75711820

PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent M. Amberly

VINCENT M AMBERLY AMBERLY & ASSOCIATES8270 GREENSBORO DR STE 850MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized online ordering services in the field of computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 10, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 17, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance