Drawing for LASVEGAS.COM

USPTO serial 75712213

LASVEGAS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LASVEGAS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Craft

Jennifer K. Craft Dickinson Wright PLLC8363 West Sunset Road, Ste. 200Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING ONLINE WEBSITES FEATURING INFORMATION SUCH AS THAT GENERALLY FOUND IN DAILY NEWSPAPERS, AS WELL AS INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF NEWS, POLITICS, PUBLIC POLICY, AND TECHNOLOGYACTIVEOct 31, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 19, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 21, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance