USPTO serial 75712391
WARTHOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WARTHOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Washington, MO
WASHINGTON, MO
Washington, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LIONEL L LUCCHESI
LIONEL L LUCCHESI POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESISTE 20012412 POWERSCOURT DRST LOUIS, MO 63131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric lights, namely taillights, headlights, running lights, backup lights, and parking lights for automobiles, trucks, recreational land vehicles, and motor crafts | ACTIVE | Aug 26, 2003 |
| 012 | Brake systems comprised motor, hydraulic pump, and microprocessor for applying brakes in tandem between the land vehicle and the trailer; trailer mounted hydraulic jack; electric lights, namely, turn signal lights for automobiles, trucks, recreational land vehicles and motor craft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by N.I.R., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONGO LIGHT CO. INC.
- Other trademarks owned by N.I.R., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named WARTHOG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |