USPTO serial 75713450
NOVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheonan-Shi, Chungcheongnam-Do, 330-810, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Berg
RICHARD P BERG LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC JUICERS; ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANERS; KITCHEN MACHINES, NAMELY, FOOD MIXERS, DISH WASHING MACHINES, NOODLE MAKING MACHINES, BREAD MAKING MACHINES, AND CONFECTIONERY MAKING MACHINES; ELECTRIC SCISSORS; WIRE BRUSHES FOR USE IN MACHINES; ELECTRIC WASHING MACHINES FOR CLOTHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | BIDETS; HUMIDIFIERS; ELECTRIC ROTARY TOASTER OVENS FOR DOMESTIC USE; RICE COOKERS; WATER PURIFYING APPARATUS, NAMELY, WATER FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; HAIR DRIERS; DEHUMIDIFIERS; AIR PURIFYING APPARATUS, NAMELY, AIR FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; ELECTRIC FANS; PORTABLE ELECTRIC HEATERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |