USPTO serial 75713485
ARBORSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARBORSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT
JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-bacterial, cleaning and disinfectant products for agricultural, commercial, domestic and industrial use, namely, bowl cleaners, carpet shampoos, fabric softeners, laundry detergents, and soaps; cosmetics, namely, lip balm, lipstick, and body powders; health and beauty products, namely, body oil, deodorants for personal use, hand wash, skin and body lotion, skin moisturizer, mouthwash, perfume, body, feet and baby powders, toothpaste, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, skin cream, face and body soaps, sun block, sun tan lotion, and after sun lotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Herbicides, insecticides and pesticides, all for agricultural and domestic use; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, bath additives, lice killing shampoo, and preparations for the treatment of parasites; air fresheners; insect repellent; powders for treatment of parasites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ecosmart Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ecosmart Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ARBORSAFE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |