Drawing for THE OBSERVER

USPTO serial 75713489

THE OBSERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE OBSERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Reily

PAUL REILY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer progammes; computer software; computer data published by electronic means; CD ROM's, CDI's; compact discs, books or periodicals in the form of electronic publications; cassettes; computer discs and tapes; media for storing information, data signals, images and sound, machine readable media; photographic films; cinematographic films or photographic films all prepared for exhibition; publications in electronic form; mouse matsACTIVE—
016Paper, printed matter, newspapers; publications; periodicals; magazines; newsletters; books; directories; computer programmes recorded on paper or cardboard; pamphlets; graphic representations; graphic prints; photographs; bags; calendars; diaries; stationery; posters; pictures; pens; pencils; greeting cards; writing materials; playing cards; note books; advertisement boards; boxesACTIVE—
035Advertising services; arranging and conducting trade shows, seminars, conferences and exhibitionsACTIVE—
038Providing accessing to online information; communication services; broadcasting servicesACTIVE—
041Educational and training services; publication services; publication of education materials; arranging and conducting seminars, exhibition conferences and trade shows, provision of interactive information; providing access to and leasing access time to computer databases or on-line informationACTIVE—
042Providing interactive computer databases and on-line information in the field of general newsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 2, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 20, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Dec 11, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 25, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 3, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance