Drawing for LEARNNOW

USPTO serial 75713643

LEARNNOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEARNNOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Slafsky

LARRY W MCFARLAND LARRY W MCFARLAND KEATSMCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD-PENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, training services in the field of math, language, science, arts, history, vocations, computers, technology, social science, athletics, and life skillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 4, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 2, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2001OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 25, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance