USPTO serial 75713828
CONFLUENT SURGICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2782144Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2003
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONFLUENT SURGICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aryn Wadadli
Aryn Wadadli Covidien555 Long Wharf DriveNew Haven, CT 06511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | in situ polymerizing hydrogel-based medical devices, namely, post surgical adhesion prevention barriers and sealant preparations for tissue sealing and space filling; in situ polymerizing hydrogel-based medical coating materials used in the treatment of aneurisms; liquid embolics for use in endovascular surgical procedures; preformed patches and sheets sold with medication for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | in situ polymerizing hydrogel-based drug delivery systems comprised of synthetic polymers for tissue sealing and local drug delivery; compositions for medical use, namely, synthetic, biocompatible, hydrogel precursors, biocompatible crosslinked polymers for use in surgical procedures; resorbable and nonresorbable protectors for use in surgical procedures; sealing and space filling drug delivery systems comprised of synthetic polymers and delivery catheters for tissue sealing and local drug delivery; drug delivery systems, namely, air assisted sprayers and non-air assisted sprayers, multi-lumen catheters and single lumen catheters and preformed patches and sheets sold without medication for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Confluent Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Confluent Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Confluent Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named CONFLUENT SURGICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |