USPTO serial 75713847
ZINCTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2002
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZINCTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo-Ann Heikkila
381 North Service Road WestOakville, Ontario, L6M0H4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | an ingredient for food and sports nutrition supplements for strength and performance enhancement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MISC US TRADEMARK LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ZINCTECH
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |