Drawing for INDOOR

USPTO serial 75714953

INDOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark E Myers

MARK E MYERS GRUNSKY EBEY FARRAR & HOWELL240 WESTGATE DRWATSONVILLE, CA 95076UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001potting soil and soil conditioners for agricultural and domestic useACTIVEAug 25, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 21, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 19, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 15, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 11, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance