USPTO serial 75714956
FLOWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEANNETTE K. WITTEN
JEANNETTE K WITTEN MYERS & WITTEN5 HARRIS COURT BLDG N STE 3MONTEREY, CA 93940UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | garden mulch | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |