USPTO serial 75715301
BAYONET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3021244Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAYONET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS ACQUISITION AND MERGER CONSULTATION, NAMELY, ADVICE, CONSULTATION AND PLANNING REGARDING MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, BUSINESS CONSOLIDATIONS, BUYOUTS, PURCHASES AND SALES OF BUSINESSES AND OF SHARES IN BUSINESSES, AND BUSINESS START-UP AND GROWTH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2001 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION; FINANCIAL INVESTMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF SECURITIES, CASH MANAGEMENT, COMMODITIES, AND REAL ESTATE; FINANCING SERVICES; TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT LOAN AND CAPITAL FINANCING FOR BUSINESSES; SECURITIES BROKERAGE; INVESTMENT BROKERAGE AND BUSINESS BROKERAGE; FINANCIAL INSTITUTION HOLDING COMPANY SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COMMON OWNERSHIP, COMMON FINANCIAL CONTROL AND REPORTING OF SEVERAL INSTITUTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2001 |
| 042 | INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION; COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS FOR OTHERS; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; MONITORING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS FOR TECHNICAL PURPOSES AND PROVIDING BACK-UP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Howard, R. Keith
- Other trademarks owned by Howard, R. Keith
- Other trademarks owned by Howard, R. Keith
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BAYONET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |