Drawing for EXPERIENCE

USPTO serial 75716243

EXPERIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Sprinkle

JENNIFER L SCULLY FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLCSTE 34001111 THIRD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for art design and art-related activities; providing information and consulting services related to art and art design via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 31, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 27, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2001OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 26, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance