CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TIGER HEAD

USPTO serial 75716497

TIGER HEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIGER HEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary M. Nath

GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES1030 FIFTEENTH ST NW SIXTH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DRY CELL BATTERIES USED IN FLASHLIGHTS AND TOYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance