USPTO serial 75716674
CITEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edwalton, Nottingham NG12 4DG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger T. Froat
ROGER T FROAT JONES & ASKEW, LLP2400 MONARCH TWR3424 PEACHTREE RD N RATLANTA, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | voice and data communication computer software and hardware to handle telephone calls by means of a computer graphical user interface (GUI) and to integrate calls with contact managers and other personal computer applications; computer hardware and software for use in the field of computer telephony integration to connect business digital telephones to personal computers and to enable collaborative communications in an internet protocol environment; and unified messaging computer software and hardware for managing voicemails, faxes, and e-mails at the desktop and by means of remote access | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |