USPTO serial 75716869
SIMULA SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMULA SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHY J MCKNIGHT
KATHY J MCKNIGHT SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TRANSPARENT POLYURETHANE CAST OR MOLDED PRODUCTS, NAMELY, EYEGLASS LENSES, EYEGLASS LENSES FOR SUNGLASSES, OPHTHALMIC CORRECTIVE LENSES, PROTECTIVE EYEGLASSES, PROTECTIVE EYEGLASS LENSES; TRANSPARENT ARMOR FOR USE IN VEHICULAR AND ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATIONS; CLEAR SCREENS FOR ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS SUCH AS CRT SCREENS, FLAT PANEL SCREENS, AND THE LIKE; SAFETY SENSORS WHICH MONITOR VEHICLE AND AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES FOR SAFETY, NAMELY, FIBER OPTIC SENSORS, SMART SENSORS, CRASH SENSORS, AIRBAG SENSORS AND STRUCTURAL DAMAGE SENSORS; NEURAL NETWORK PROCESSING MODULES IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER CHIPS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN INTERPRETING SENSOR DATA, NAMELY, CRASH SENSORS; PERSONAL SAFETY SYSTEMS COMPRISING GARMENTS WORN FOR PERSONAL PROTECTION, NAMELY, LIFE JACKETS AND BULLET-PROOF VESTS AND CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |