USPTO serial 75717338
NICU2GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NICU2GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathryn A. Mitchell
Cathryn A. Mitchell Cathryn A. Mitchell Law Offices LLCPO Box 68Princeton, NJ 08542UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing educational information and educational testing services for nurses in the fields of nursing and medicine; providing educational information and educational testing services for nurses in the fields of nursing and medicine by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |