USPTO serial 75717472
L.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Schmitt
JOHN L SCHMITTP O BOX 656GENEVA, IL 60134-0656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP IN THE FIELD OF PET RELATED GOODS NAMELY, DRY, CANNED, FROZEN DOG AND CAT FOODS; DOG TREATS, BISCUITS, AND CHEWS; NON-MEDICATED AND MEDICATED PET SHAMPOOS, NON-MEDICATED AND MEDICATED PET HAIR AND SKIN CONDITIONERS, AND SCENTED BODY SPRAYS FOR PETS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR DOGS AND CATS; PET STAIN AND ODOR REMOVERS; PET AND WILD BIRD FEEDS; SMALL ANIMAL PET FOODS; PET BEDDING; BIRD CAGES AND CAGE ACCESSORIES NAMELY, PLAYTOPS, PERCHES, COVERS, LADDERS, GYMS, FEED/WATER CROCKS, AND TOYS; and PET FEED/WATER CROCKS | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |