USPTO serial 75717940
EDULEARN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2001
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EDULEARN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-88400 Biberach, DE
D-88400 Biberach, DE
D-88400 Biberach, DE
BIBERACH, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL O'TOOLE GERSTEIN MURRAY & BORUN6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DENTAL LABORATORIES AND DENTAL TEACHING FACILITIES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR IMAGING PROCESSING; COMPUTER-AIDED IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | DENTAL INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS, NAMELY COMPUTER-AIDED IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICES, TABLES FOR DENTISTS AND DENTAL TECHNICIANS, AND WORK TRAYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaltenbach & Voigt GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaltenbach & Voigt GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Kaltenbach & Voigt GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by KALTENBACH & VOIGT GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EDULEARN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |