Drawing for FOOD.COMMMM

USPTO serial 75717961

FOOD.COMMMM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FOOD.COMMMM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN W. CRITTENDEN

JOHN W CRITTENDEN COOLEY GODWARD LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAWONE MARITIME PLZ20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Chef, butcher, kitchen, and paring knives; cutlery, forks and spoonsACTIVE—
021Small domestic utensils and containers, namely, kitchen wood chopping boards, kitchen containers, kitchen ladles; beverage glassware; porcelain and earthenware, namely, plates, platters, dishes, bowls, cups, saucers, serving dishes, serving plates, and containers for household or kitchen useACTIVE—
024Kitchen towels, oven mitts, and pot holdersACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, cloth bibs, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, shirts, shorts, hats, scarves, jackets, socks, boxer shorts, and apronsACTIVE—
028Playthings, namely soft plush toysACTIVE—
029Food and beverage products, namely, meat, fish, and poultry; preserved dried and cooked fruits and Vegetables; fruit preserves and pickles; packaged combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and processed fruitACTIVE—
030Package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and cookiesACTIVE—
032Beverages, namely, beer, ale and porter; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit-flavored drinks, fruit-flavored soft drinks, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; soda water; fruit and vegetable drinks and juicesACTIVE—
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 15, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance