USPTO serial 75717971
TELIA BUDGET CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELIA BUDGET CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
123 86 Farsta, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CODED MAGNETIC CARDS; IN ADVANCE PAID TELEPHONE CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS; CODE DECIPHERING MACHINES FOR MAGNETICALLY ENCODED PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS; DATA PROCESSORS FOR MAGNETICALLY ENCODED PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DEBIT CARDS AND SMART CARDS; REGISTERED SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRIC DATA TRANSMISSION VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | ELECTRIC DEBIT AND CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION VIA DATA COMMUNICATIONS; ELECTRIC FUNDS TRANSFER | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS AND TELEPHONE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |