USPTO serial 75720350
PRECIOUS IN HIS SIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOHR, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRECIOUS IN HIS SIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M JEAN HOLMES
RHONDA BARRETTP O BOX 985SULPHUR, OK 73086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ministry goods encouraging spiritual growth, namely, newsletters and calendars featuring bible verses and written prayers, and art prints | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |