USPTO serial 75720619
FOCUS ON BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOCUS ON BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario M1B 3V1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H BEGLER
JAY H BEGLER HARRIS BEACH & WILCOX LLP530 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Astringents for cosmetic purposes, non-medicated lip balm, bath oil, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, blusher, body cream, body oil, body powder, cold cream, cologne, cosmetics compacts, cosmetic pencils, cosmetic applicators, namely, cotton sticks and cotton balls for applying cosmetics, eye cream, hand cream, night cream, skin-cleansing cream, skin cream, vanishing cream, perfume, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye shadow, face powder, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, bath gel, hair gel, shower gel, lip gloss, lipstick, hair spray, makeup, mascara, massage oil, skin moisturizer, nail polish, rouge, sachets, hair shampoo, toilet water, wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manicure and pedicure implements, namely, nail files, files for removal of dry skin used for pedicures, nail clippers, tweezers, cuticle scissors and cuticle sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bristle bath brushes, cosmetic brushes, cosmetic sponges and bath sponges, loofa products such as loofa sponges and loofa back brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |