USPTO serial 75720971
CORESTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2911314Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CORESTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tyler S. Brown
Tyler S. Brown Ciena Corporation1201 Winterson RoadLinthicum, MD 21090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK ELEMENTS, NAMELY OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS, OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES, OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS, AND OPTICAL RECEIVERS FOR DEPLOYING WAVELENGTH-DIVISION MULTIPLEXED OPTICAL SIGNALS AND INSTRUCTION AND USER MANUALS THEREFOR SOLD AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |