USPTO serial 75721760
VOICEPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOICEPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G ROXANNE ELINGS
G ROXANNE ELINGS GRAHAM & JAMES LLP885 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4898UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote control for a personal computer; audio device, namely, a recorder incorporating electronic controls for playback, pause, noise reduction and volume adjustment capabilities for audio input and output to/from a computer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |