USPTO serial 75722153
PULSENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PULSENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and computer hardware for delivering rich media content to user's personal computers and television sets, via global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |