Drawing for OPUS ONE

USPTO serial 75722593

OPUS ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPUS ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc A. Bergsman

MARC A BERGSMAN DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1901 L ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVEAug 24, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 25, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 25, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 21, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance