USPTO serial 75722698
EARTH POLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOH, JAY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARTH POLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Haddonfield, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP2005 MARKET ST 22ND FLONE COMMERCE SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed instructional, educational and teaching materials in the fields of ayurvedic and holistic healing, health, well-being, the mind-body connection, yoga and meditation | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars, lectures, workshops, and instructor training in the fields of ayurvedic and holistic healing, health, well-being, the mind-body connection, yoga and meditation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |