USPTO serial 75723245
AUTOMATED INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING (AIDM)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMATED INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING (AIDM)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INDEXING, INTERFACING, ACCESSING, SEARCHING, BROWSING, VISUALIZING, ORGANIZING AND ANALYZING DATA AND RESEARCH FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS AND ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROMS, VIDEO DISCS, DISKETTES, DVD-ROMS AND MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVES AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS AND ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASES FOR INDEXING, INTERFACING, ACCESSING, SEARCHING, BROWSING, VISUALIZING, ORGANIZING AND ANALYZING DATA AND RESEARCH FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS AND ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TransCom Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TransCom Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AUTOMATED INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING (AIDM)
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |