Drawing for GO2WORLD.COM

USPTO serial 75724004

GO2WORLD.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GO2WORLD.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs and computer programs that are downloaded from the internet for browsing and acquiring information and data on the internet, for customizing the appearance of computer displays, for reading characters in multiple languages and for language translation, and accompanying manuals sold as a unitACTIVE
038Messaging services, namely, delivery of written and oral messages by electronic transmission, electronic mail and message notification services, message translation services, providing on-line bulletin boards and chat rooms concerning topics and general interest, and providing online wake-up call servicesACTIVE
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line access to databases of information, search engines, hyperlinks, and non-downloadable computer programs regarding listings and information in the fields of arts and entertainment, automotive, business and finance, computing, education, games, health and fitness, home and family, the internet, language translation, news and media, reference materials, science and technology, shopping, society and culture, sports and recreation, travel, and the weatherACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2013UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 11, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 7, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 14, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 14, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 8, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 6, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 3, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 1, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 15, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 13, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 1, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance