USPTO serial 75724700
UTEE BUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTEE BUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SKIRTS, CAPS AND HEADWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |