USPTO serial 75724866
SUPERPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC MOTORS AND ELECTRIC GENERATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS, ELECTRICAL CABLES, CURRENT LEADS, FAULT CURRENT LIMITERS, ELECTRICAL COILS, AND ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS, ALL FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SUPERCONDUCTORS, NAMELY HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS (HTS) AND LOW TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS (LTS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |