Drawing for HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND

USPTO serial 75725938

HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC VALVES FOR AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT CONSTRUCTIONACTIVENov 19, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 8, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 26, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 9, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance