USPTO serial 75726588
BUY-CYCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2380133Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2000
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUY-CYCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online buying services in the nature of providing discount prices to purchasers of consumer goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 7, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |