USPTO serial 75726595
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail services featuring a wide variety of goods and services; providing access to computer databases and networks featuring access to computerized shopping via telephone and computer terminals in the field of general consumer goods and services; providing access to computer databases, web sites and home pages of others in the field of general consumer goods and services; technical assistance, technical support and business consultation services related to advertising and marketing on online commercial web sites, market research services to online consumer behavior; providing information regarding the goods and services of customers by means of a global computer network; acquiring and proving group discounts for others in the filed of small business services; directory services listing web site addresses | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, creation, hosting and maintenance of web sites for others; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via a global computer network, telephone and email; computer consultation, namely, consulting on the designing, creating, hosting, maintenance, operating and managing of commercial websites; providing temporary use of online catalogs, websites, electronic storefronts and database-related applications on global and internal communications networks providing an on-line resources page that includes links to the web sites and on-line services of others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |