Drawing for CENTERFOLDS

USPTO serial 75726622

CENTERFOLDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTERFOLDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. James Bushman

C JAMES BUSHMAN BROWNING BUSHMAN5718 WESTHEIMERSTE 1800HOUSTON, TX 77057

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Gentlemen's club services; namely providing live adult entertainment for patrons of clubs at specified physical locationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 4, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 20, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 11, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance