USPTO serial 75726794
MUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Central Hong Kong, HK
Central Hong Kong, HK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer designing and programming, and software content developing, and software development consulting associated therewith and server hosting associated therewith, for others for communication platforms and subsystems for use in processing voice, video and data signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Muse Communications Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Muse Communications Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by POD Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Muse Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MUSE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |