USPTO serial 75728345
VIZCAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2936492Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIZCAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mextra Importacao E Comercio Ltda.
Rio De Janeiro, RJ CEP, BR
Other trademarks owned by Mextra Importacao E Comercio Ltda.
Mextra Importacao E Comercio Ltda.
Rio De Janeiro, RJ CEP, BR
Other trademarks owned by Mextra Importacao E Comercio Ltda.
RIO DE JANEIRO, RJ CEP, BR
RIO DE JANEIRO, RJ CEP, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR SHAMPOOS, NAMELY, ANTI-DANDRUFF SHAMPOO, SHAMPOO TO PREVENT HAIR LOSS, CREAM-SHAMPOO, VITAMIN SHAMPOO, DEEP CLEANSING SHAMPOO, MOISTURIZER SHAMPOO, VITAMIN MOISTURIZER AND MOISTURIZER CREAM; COSMETIC CREAMS, NAMELY, FACE MOISTURIZER, [ SKIN CLEANSING MILK FOR TOILET PURPOSES, TONIC FACE LOTION, OUTLINE EYE GELS; ] AFTER BATH CREAMS; [ BODY GLAZING GEL; ] TOILET LIQUID SOAP; [ BODY OIL; ANTI-CELLULITE CREAM; PERFUMES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mextra Importacao E Comercio Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by Mextra Importacao E Comercio Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by MEXTRA COSMETICOS LTDA.
- Other trademarks owned by MEXTRA COSMETICOS LTDA.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named VIZCAYA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |