Drawing for REDDY FLAME

USPTO serial 75728481

REDDY FLAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDDY FLAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Welter

PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air conditioning units, dishwashers, clothes washers, clothes dryers, electric timers, electric fans, electric light fixtures, indoor and outdoor lights, refrigerators, and domestic water heatersACTIVE—
016Educational materials, namely, poster, leaflets, printed magazine inserts and brochures about energy and natural resource consumption and conservationACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, caps, hats, shirts, pullovers, polo shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, wind shirts, boxer shorts, neckties, vests, jackets and baby bibs not made of paperACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely, golf balls, golf club protectorsACTIVE—
035Computerized on-line retail services and distributorship services featuring products and services used for energy and natural resource consumption and conservationACTIVE—
041Development and dissemination of educational materials in the field of energy and natural resource consumption and conservationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance