USPTO serial 75728584
GRAB 'EM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAB 'EM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. McCully
MICHAEL D MCCULLY PRINCE, YEATES & GELDZAHLERCITY CTR 1 STE 900175 E FOURTH SSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online computer services, namely, providing information in the fields of e-commerce, e-retailing and e-wholesaling by means of a global communications network, and providing links to other websites in the fields of e-commerce, e-retailing and e-wholesaling by means of a global computer network; promoting goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed through computer networks; online wholesale and retail store services and computerized purchasing services in the field of general merchandise; online auction services; providing online directory information services also featuring hyperlinks to other websites in the fields of e-commerce, e-retailing and e-wholesaling; providing evaluative feedback and ratings of sellers' goods and services, the values and prices of sellers' goods and services, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall trading experience in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating, hosting, and maintaining global computer network websites for others featuring website links to multiple business entities with e-commerce functionality; computer services providing customized online web links to news, weather, sports, current events, reference materials, and customized e-mail messages, all in a wide range of user-defined fields; creating indexes of information, goods, services, websites, and other resources on computer networks for others; searching and retrieving information, websites, and other resources available on computer networks for others; providing information and advice to providers and users of computerized online shopping services, namely, online access to product descriptions, demonstrations, listing of product price, size, weight, make, model, name, description of product utility, product inventory and shipping times, and reviews, and customer tracking, inventory control, and access for retailers to customer information contained in database | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERMIX NETWORK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Just Grab It, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Just Grab It, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GRAB 'EM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |