USPTO serial 75728998
BROKER IQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BROKER IQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Corporate Executive Solutions, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Corporate Executive Solutions, Inc.
IRVING, TX
Corporate Executive Solutions, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Corporate Executive Solutions, Inc.
IRVING, TX
DALLAS, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in assisting broker-dealers and others in the financial industry | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Executive Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Q4I, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Executive Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Q4I INC
- Other trademarks owned by Q4I.COM INC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BROKER IQ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |