USPTO serial 75729205
MERIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Research Triangle Park, NC
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Research Triangle Park, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELDON R. PONTAOE
SHELDON R PONTAOE GLAXO WELLCOME INCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP - MAI-4845 MOORE DRRESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | consultation and health care analysis services, namely providing employers and managed care organizations with information on health care costs associated with migraine and on cost savings related to the use of migraine medications, by using actuarial models to estimate direct medical costs and lost productivity costs due to migraine and cost savings related to the use of migraine medications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Glaxo Wellcome Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Glaxo Wellcome Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MERIT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |